Corax Mulciber took a look at the records of the camp at Adur (where the fiendishly corrupt staff was pocketing budgetary appropriations for food and semi-starving the residents). Now he reasons, hey, apparently Muggles don't need much food after all! How little food can we get away with giving them? What a way to save money, right? So he's ordered me to set up an 'experiment' to find out, using the six camps in Kent as test subjects.
The camps are Ashford, Chipstead, Maidstone, Sevenoaks, Swale, and Tunbridge Wells. The food budget at Wells will remain the same, as a control. He's ordered me to cut the food budgets and thus the allotments for the other five in various amounts:
Ashford - 7%
Chipstead - 14%
Maidstone - 21%
Sevenoaks - 28%
Swale - 35%
So Swale will suffer the most. He wants to run this jolly little experiment for three months, and then he'll use the data to re-evaluate. For all I know, he could decide it's a great idea and cut food allotments even more, or even start in on other camps.
And lucky me, I get to implement it.
This is horrible. If we smuggle food into the camps, then it'll look as though massive food cuts don't have any effect--so they'll make even larger food cuts at the next go-around. Another option I considered would be to smuggle people out of the camps, to spread the food out between the fewer people left--except that wouldn't work either. A large pattern of escapes would surely draw MLE scrutiny. The authorities are not stupid enough to keep importing the same amount of food if people are disappearing. They do camp censuses every week. If they have less people, they'll just import less food. They very well might retaliate against the people left behind.
I don't know what's lighting his wand over this: lower budget figures, the chance to torture people with hunger, or even to get rid of some more of those muggles which he absolutely hates, through starvation (although he snarled at me, calling me an idiot, when I asked him if that was his purpose).
Throw me a line here, somebody. What can we do? What can I do?
The camps are Ashford, Chipstead, Maidstone, Sevenoaks, Swale, and Tunbridge Wells. The food budget at Wells will remain the same, as a control. He's ordered me to cut the food budgets and thus the allotments for the other five in various amounts:
Ashford - 7%
Chipstead - 14%
Maidstone - 21%
Sevenoaks - 28%
Swale - 35%
So Swale will suffer the most. He wants to run this jolly little experiment for three months, and then he'll use the data to re-evaluate. For all I know, he could decide it's a great idea and cut food allotments even more, or even start in on other camps.
And lucky me, I get to implement it.
This is horrible. If we smuggle food into the camps, then it'll look as though massive food cuts don't have any effect--so they'll make even larger food cuts at the next go-around. Another option I considered would be to smuggle people out of the camps, to spread the food out between the fewer people left--except that wouldn't work either. A large pattern of escapes would surely draw MLE scrutiny. The authorities are not stupid enough to keep importing the same amount of food if people are disappearing. They do camp censuses every week. If they have less people, they'll just import less food. They very well might retaliate against the people left behind.
I don't know what's lighting his wand over this: lower budget figures, the chance to torture people with hunger, or even to get rid of some more of those muggles which he absolutely hates, through starvation (although he snarled at me, calling me an idiot, when I asked him if that was his purpose).
Throw me a line here, somebody. What can we do? What can I do?
no subject
Date: 2013-10-01 03:14 am (UTC)We've been discussing it here for half an hour, since you posted.
You can't shuffle the people; you can't misdirect the food - logistically that's just impractical. We might be able to supplement the food somewhat but that would still have the opposite effect you want.
Even if we did succeed in diverting say 14% of Ashford's supply and 7% of Chipstead's to Swale and Sevenoaks, so they're all operating at a 21% reduction, Mulciber will either conclude tampering or that there's no statistical difference between 7% and 35% - so as you say, he'd just as likely reduce them all by a third.
Failure from Mulciber's perspective isn't really possible. Either you've cut their allotment too much and Muggles die, or you haven't cut back enough and they continue to thrive. Either way, he's going to credit himself with saving the Ministry expenses.
The only productive option I can think of is to organise a full work stoppage at all the camps in the region. Which you'll never get - and there will be reprisals in the bargain.
Sorry, mate. I think you're buggered.
no subject
Date: 2013-10-01 03:43 am (UTC)If that's the case, then I really have nothing to offer except to inform the people concerned and respect their decisions should they decide to resist.
no subject
Date: 2013-10-01 12:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-01 03:39 am (UTC)Surely it wouldn't be overly difficult for people in these camps to give the appearance of weakening and sickening over your three month period, gradually showing themselves listless and unfit for work.
Of course, if Frank and others believe that we're organised enough to support large-scale rebellions in those camps, then that's an entirely different matter. My suggestions suppose that we aren't yet in a position to encourage resistance.
no subject
Date: 2013-10-01 01:24 pm (UTC)I do have a question about Tunbridge Wells. They're the 'control', right? I think we should tell them and urge them to pick up their productivity a little bit. Not a huge amount all at once, but a little and maybe gradually more. Just enough that the argument could still be made that the improvement is down to Autumn's making work easier. But a bit of improvement there would help make the decline in other camps look more significant.
Or does that seem too likely to look like someone's been rigging the experiment?
no subject
Date: 2013-10-01 09:31 pm (UTC)I think we can make a case for a slowdown, and how it'd be helpful for them -- and work on our end to provide them with supplements and teach those with wands to use glamours to make it look worse than it is.
so we can use the buttons to spread the word, see if we can't get everyone on the same page.
we aren't well enough armed and prepared for all out rebellions. got some pilot programmes in the camps we've got contacts in to learn how to ward buildings for safety, but there aren't enough wands to support a sustained fight, and it'd get bloody pretty quick. but this sort of thing might make them trust us more, and make it more likely they'd be on board for something bigger further down the line.
no subject
Date: 2013-10-01 11:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-01 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-01 11:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-03 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-03 11:23 pm (UTC)Bill, how are the meetings going with the camp administrators?
no subject
Date: 2013-10-03 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-01 11:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-02 05:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-01 11:37 pm (UTC)I'm feeling a lot more hope than I felt yesterday. This is an excellent reason to use the buttons, and I hope it'll work. Depends on whose hands they're in, I suppose.
no subject
Date: 2013-10-03 12:50 am (UTC)I mean, assuming Muggle Domestication overall has the same attitude as the Strettons.